🎯 Arb Desk Report

Date: March 25, 2026

This report highlights the top five opportunities with precise prices and spreads from the dataset, plus an assessment of executability and risk. Below that, you’ll find patterns across exchanges, speed versus size tradeoffs, a concrete profit framework with fees, risk alerts, and a glance at what to watch tomorrow.

---

🏆 Top 5 Arbitrage Opportunities

• Asset and spread: SIREN, 14.14% spread.
• Buy exchange and price: KuCoin at $2.049710.
• Sell exchange and price: Bitunix at $2.182910.
• Available volume: Not disclosed in the data.
• Window duration: Not disclosed in the data.
• Risk factors: Bitunix liquidity depth, cross-exchange withdrawal times, potential bridge delays, and execution risk from price jumps during cross-exchange transfers. KuCoin liquidity at this price point also matters; if the orderbook on KuCoin thins, slippage will erode the edge quickly.
• Executability take: The spread is large, but practical execution hinges on immediate cross-exchange settlement and fast transfer channels. Theoretically executable for a high-speed arb desk with co-located liquidity and wire/crypto bridges; in practice, execution risk is non-trivial due to latency, withdrawal constraints, and potential exchange-specific throttling.

• Asset and spread: DOT, 9.51% spread.
• Buy exchange and price: Coinbase at $1.388000.
• Sell exchange and price: Coinbase at $1.520000.
• Available volume: Not disclosed.
• Window duration: Not disclosed.
• Risk factors: Anomaly is that both legs reference Coinbase; true cross-exchange opportunity is ambiguous unless there is a separate venue (or a funding/derivative instrument) on Coinbase itself. If the data imply a cross-venue setup, liquidity on Coinbase’s orderbook for DOT must be deep enough to support fast fills; otherwise, slippage may consume edge.
• Executability take: If there is a genuine cross-exchange path (i.e., a reachable buy and a separate sell venue with DOT liquidity), it is executable in principle. If the only path is a single-venue spread (Coinbase to itself), the practical arbitrage does not materialize; execution feasibility depends on whether a second market (spot vs futures, or another exchange’s DOT pair) can be used without prohibitive bridge times.

• Asset and spread: ONT, 7.58% spread.
• Buy exchange and price: Bitunix at $0.067737.
• Sell exchange and price: Gate Futures at $0.069610.
• Available volume: Not disclosed.
• Window duration: Not disclosed.
• Risk factors: Bitunix liquidity depth for ONT at the buy price andGate Futures’ withdrawal/settlement timings, plus any cross-exchange transfer frictions. Additionally, futures pricing and funding rates on Gate Futures can introduce basis risk if the price moves between liquidation and settlement.
• Executability take: Viable in a fast-arb environment if the transfer and settlement times are short and liquidity on both sides is sufficient. The edge (0.001873 per unit) is modest but actionable with high-volume capability and tight slippage management.

• Asset and spread: SIREN, 7.56% spread.
• Buy exchange and price: Bybit at $1.169782.
• Sell exchange and price: Bitunix at $1.258160.
• Available volume: Not disclosed.
• Window duration: Not disclosed.
• Risk factors: Bybit’s liquidity for the buy leg and Bitunix’s ability to receive and settle quickly for the sell leg; cross-exchange settlement times, withdrawal queues, and potential one-way action risk if one venue delays withdrawals.
• Executability take: The edge per unit is meaningful (0.088378) and should be executable by a liquidity-ready arb desk with near-instant cross-exchange movements, assuming no hidden fees or delays.

• Asset and spread: HIPPO, 7.28% spread.
• Buy exchange and price: Bitunix at $0.000586.
• Sell exchange and price: Bybit at $0.000601.
• Available volume: Not disclosed.
• Window duration: Not disclosed.
• Risk factors: Very low nominal price magnifies unit-level risk: tiny price moves yield sizable percentage changes, but liquidity and liquidity-driven slippage will dominate. Bitunix’s micro-quantite liquidity and Bybit’s speed must be in sync; friction could wipe out edge quickly. Also, normal withdrawal times for tiny tokens can be punitive if you intend to realize profits.
• Executability take: In theory executable for micro-quantities, but real-world viability depends on extremely low-latency access to both venues and the ability to lock in fast settlements. The per-unit edge is small (0.000015 gross), so only sizable volumes would be meaningful; else, operational costs overwhelm the edge.

---

📊 Exchange Spread Patterns

• Cross-exchange clusters around a KuCoin buy anchor for SIREN. In multiple SIREN lines, KuCoin is the buy venue, while sell legs come from Bitunix, Bybit, and Binance Futures. This suggests a recurring pattern where KuCoin occasionally hosts favorable bids relative to specialized sell venues.

• The DOT entry is a Coinbase-centered pattern, with both buy and sell shown on Coinbase in the data. If this represents a cross-venue DOT fly (spot vs futures or another Coinbase venue), the pattern emphasizes Coinbase’s depth but also the risk that the same venue does not produce a true cross-border edge without a separate sell side.

• ONT shows mixed buy legs: Bitunix (buy) paired with Gate Futures (sell) and Bitget (buy) paired with Bybit (sell). This indicates that ONT arbitrage is more about cross-venue spreads among newer/derivative venues rather than a single anchor venue.

• HIPPO’s play is Bitunix buy against Bybit sell, highlighting a Bybit–Bitunix cross-venue dynamic that can be sensitive to withdrawal pacing and token liquidity.

• Across the board, the strongest patterns involve KuCoin as a buy-side anchor with multiple sell-side outlets (Bitunix, Bybit, Gate Futures, Binance Futures). On the sell side, Gate Futures and Bitunix are frequently present, indicating these venues still present meaningful cross-venue risk but with liquidity caveats.

• In short, the data suggest a recurring theme: a robust KuCoin buy anchor for select SIREN plays, with diverse sell anchors that can deliver edge if the liquidity footprints are adequate and settlement times align. DOT’s Coinbase pair represents a different dynamic: stable venue depth but less cross-venue friction in the data, which raises questions about truly cross-venue execution versus a single-venue edge.

---

⚡ Speed vs Size Analysis

• Speed edge: The top spreads tend to be large, but the actual edge collapses quickly if you cannot feed liquidity fast enough or bridge across exchanges with minimal delay. The SIREN, DOT, and ONT lines illustrate the gap between a big nominal spread and the actual realized profit once you factor in transfer times, on-chain confirmation delays, and exchange withdrawal queues.

• Size edge: Smaller, extremely liquid pairs (like DOT on Coinbase) can tolerate bigger sizes without slippage, but even there, the net edge hinges on how quickly you can move funds and how deep the order books are at the exact moments of execution. HIPPO, with its extremely low price, can deliver micro-edges that compound with large volumes but is vulnerable to liquidity gaps and bridge costs.

• Position sizing guidance:
• For high-liquidity anchors (e.g., DOT on Coinbase, major stablecoins on Coinbase), consider mid-to-large notional sizes with robust connectivity and fast withdrawal lanes to minimize bridge-induced slippage.
• For micro-edge tokens (HIPPO) or thinly traded crosses (ONT via Bitunix/Gate Futures), keep smaller position sizes unless you can prove consistent fill and speedy settlement.
• Always stress-test for slippage at the expected execution window and have contingency routes (different sell-venue options) to preserve the edge if one leg dries up.

• Slippage considerations: Use the worst-case depth scenario in each leg to bound your expected slippage. If you expect edge erosion beyond a threshold (e.g., more than 20-30% of the nominal spread in the first few basis points of price impact), you should prune or skip that leg.

---

💰 Profit Calculations

Below is a structured walk-through using the top five opportunities, assuming a representative per-unit approach and a standard approximate trading fee of 0.1% per side (0.2% total round-trip), for illustration. Actual profits will depend on the exact fee schedule at each venue and any withdrawal costs.

• Assumptions for example calculations:
• Trading fees: 0.1% per side (0.2% total round-trip). This yields buy fee = price_buy × 0.001, sell fee = price_sell × 0.001.
• No withdrawal fees in the baseline scenario. If withdrawal fees apply, deduct them after the trade profits.
• Profit is represented on a per-unit basis (one unit of the asset in question). Scale by the actual tradable volume to compute real dollars.

• Per-unit gross profit (sell price – buy price): 2.182910 − 2.049710 = 0.133200
• Buy cost with fee: 2.049710 × (1 + 0.001) = 2.052? (roughly 2.051760)
• Sell revenue with fee: 2.182910 × (1 − 0.001) = 2.181? (roughly 2.181727)
• Net profit per unit (approx): 0.133200 − (0.001 of buy) − (0.001 of sell) ≈ 0.124735
• Example scaling: At 1,000 units, net ≈ 124.74 USD; at 8,000 units, ≈ 997.88 USD
• Verdict: Executable in theory; edge is meaningful but only with fast, reliable cross-exchange movement and tight control of fees and settlement times.

• Per-unit gross profit: 1.520000 − 1.388000 = 0.132000
• Net profit per unit (approx): ≈ 0.126184
• Example scaling: 1,000 units ≈ 126.18 USD; 8,000 units ≈ 1,009.47 USD
• Verdict: Executable with adequate liquidity on Coinbase; the single-venue representation in the data makes execution contingent on true cross-venue reach or a hedged pair.

• Per-unit gross profit: 0.069610 − 0.067737 = 0.001873
• Net profit per unit (approx): ≈ 0.001598
• Example scaling: 1,000 units ≈ 1.60 USD; 625,000 units ≈ 1,000 USD
• Verdict: Edge exists but requires very precise liquidity management; large volumes necessary to accrue meaningful profit; check cross-exchange bridge times.

• Per-unit gross profit: 1.258160 − 1.169782 = 0.088378
• Net profit per unit (approx): ≈ 0.083522
• Example scaling: 1,000 units ≈ 83.52 USD; 12,000 units ≈ 1,002 USD
• Verdict: Executable for a liquidity-enabled arb shop; risk concentrated in cross-venue reliability and latency.

• Per-unit gross profit: 0.000601 − 0.000586 = 0.000015
• Net profit per unit (approx): ≈ 0.0000126
• Example scaling: 1,000 units ≈ 0.01 USD; 80,000,000 units would be needed to net ~1,000 USD (illustrative, realistically impractical)
• Verdict: Conceptually exploitable but highly sensitive to liquidity and transfer costs; only suitable for extremely high-volume, automated setups with ultra-low friction.

Minimum spread worth chasing:

• Given the baseline 0.2% round-trip fee, the minimum worthwhile edge is typically the per-unit net profit that, when scaled to your practical volume, beats operational costs. For SIREN and DOT, edges around 0.12–0.13 USD per unit are compelling if you can consistently fill 1,000–10,000+ units. For ONT and HIPPO, the per-unit edge is smaller and requires much higher volumes or exceptional liquidity to be meaningful after considering all costs.

---

⚠️ Risk Alerts

• Withdrawal delays and cross-exchange settlement times: Some venues (Gate Futures, Bitget, Bitunix, Bybit) can impose non-trivial withdrawal/settlement latencies, especially for certain tokens or during periods of high congestion. These delays can wipe out the arbitrage edge.
• Liquidity gaps and order book depth: The top edges presuppose sufficient depth on both sides. When liquidity is thin, slippage rapidly erodes profitability.
• Cross-exchange transfer frictions: Moving funds between exchanges incurs network fees and potential bridge delays. If the window duration is short, settlement risk rises sharply.
• Exchange- and token-specific risks: Some tokens (like HIPPO) trade with very small nominal prices, making unit-based profits minuscule and more sensitive to transaction costs or minor price moves.
• Market impact and regulatory considerations: Market makers should monitor for market manipulation concerns, cross-exchange price decoupling, and any exchange-specific throttling or maintenance that can unexpectedly close edges.

---

🔮 Tomorrow's Setup

• Likely continuations: Expect SIREN-driven opportunities around KuCoin as a buy anchor with sell outlets on Bitunix, Bybit, and Binance Futures. Watch for transitions in price thinness that could tighten or widen the edge quickly.
• Monitor DOT on Coinbase for potential cross-venue edges if maintained across distinct DOT markets (spot vs. futures vs. alternate Coinbase venue). Any divergence across DOT markets could create brief opportunities.
• ONT and HIPPO tokens require active liquidity surveillance. Watch Bitunix and Gate Futures for ONT, and Bybit vs. Bitunix for HIPPO. If liquidity improves on either leg or if a new cross-venue pair appears with robust depth, these edges could become actionable.
• Best times to watch: periods of low-utility noise and high-volatility cross-venue price discovery (overnight to early local market opens) tend to create or collapse edges quickly. Maintain alerts for sudden spread widenings or contractions on the top anchors (KuCoin, Bybit, Bitunix, Gate Futures, Binance Futures).

---

Sign Off

Arbitrage Hunter — March 25, 2026