🎯 Arb Desk Report

Date: March 1, 2026

The set of opportunities we highlight below represents the five highest-spread plays from the provided data sample. While 133 total events exist in the dataset, the following five illustrate the most compelling risk-adjusted deltas with clear buy and sell legs and explicit exchanges. For each, we spell out exact buy and sell prices, the specific exchanges, and a frank view on executability given typical market depth and gas/withdrawal frictions.

• Best spread overall: ROSE with a 25.66% spread (buy Coinbase at $0.011380, sell Coinbase at $0.014300)
• Second-best: APT with a 24.64% spread (buy Coinbase at $0.895000, sell Coinbase at $1.114300)
• Third: TNSR with an 11.33% spread (buy Coinbase at $0.043000, sell Bybit Spot at $0.047870)
• Fourth: FIO with a 10.28% spread (buy Bitunix at $0.016861, sell Bybit at $0.017225)
• Fifth: OP with a 9.81% spread (buy Bybit Spot at $0.119300, sell Coinbase at $0.131000)

As always with professional arb trading, the practical takeaway is to couple the spread with a disciplined view of liquidity, withdrawal/transfer latencies, and the operational risk of moving funds between venues. The following sections boil this down into actionable intelligence for top-line execution and risk controls.

---

🏆 Top 5 Arbitrage Opportunities

For each of the five opportunities below, you’ll find the asset, the exact spread, the buy and sell legs (with exchange and price), a note on available volume (where provided), an assessment of how long the window lasted (where known), risk factors, and a verdict on executability given typical market conditions.

• Buy: Coinbase at $0.011380
• Sell: Coinbase at $0.014300
• Available volume: Not specified in the dataset
• Window duration: Not specified in the dataset
• Risk factors: Intra-exchange leg, always-on as long as Coinbase shows both side quotes; but real execution depends on depth at $0.011380 buy and $0.014300 sell, potential price impact from placing a buy order, and the latency of order routing on Coinbase. Also consider spread stability; if liquidity dips, the buy leg can widen or fail to fill.
• Executability verdict: Moderately executable in theory, but only if you can source ROSE liquidity on Coinbase on both sides quickly enough to avoid slippage and integration latencies. Given the same-exchange setup and a large spread, a fast, high-fill-rate buy and sell algorithm could capture this if order book depth supports it and if you can post a resting buy near $0.011380 while simultaneously offering a sell near $0.014300 with minimal cross-currency transfer friction.
• Take: The massive 25.66% spread is enticing, but intra-exchange execution depends on inward liquidity at the exact prices; the window requires tight latency and robust order-book depth to realize.

• Buy: Coinbase at $0.895000
• Sell: Coinbase at $1.114300
• Available volume: Not specified
• Window duration: Not specified
• Risk factors: This is also an intra-exchange play. Depth matters at both the $0.895000 buy and the $1.114300 sell. The price delta is substantial, but you need to ensure you can source enough APT on Coinbase at the low price and absorb the selling pressure at the higher price without moving the market.
• Executability verdict: Potentially executable for sizable orders if the Coinbase book at these levels displays robust depth, and slippage remains contained. If liquidity is thin, the price impact could erode the spread.
• Take: High headline spread; verify order book depth and potential funding/settlement constraints before shipping capital.

• Buy: Coinbase at $0.043000
• Sell: Bybit Spot at $0.047870
• Available volume: Not specified
• Window duration: Not specified
• Risk factors: Cross-exchange leg implies you must maintain RO/USDT-like balance on both platforms or perform a trusted cross-arrangement (e.g., pre-funding). The gap is meaningful, but you’ll need robust cross-exchange transfer timing or a way to operate with dual wallets. liquidity on Bybit Spot at $0.047870 should be verified; ensure you can sell at that price without slippage.
• Executability verdict: Viable if you can execute the Coinbase buy and the Bybit sell without significant latency or fatigue on the Bybit book; ensure you have stable funding lines and that Bybit’s liquidity depth supports the sell side at $0.047870.
• Take: Interesting cross-venue delta; execution hinges on cross-exchange funding speed and book depth on Bybit.

• Buy: Bitunix at $0.016861
• Sell: Bybit at $0.017225
• Available volume: Not specified
• Window duration: Not specified
• Risk factors: This is a cross-exchange cross-venue play (Bitunix buy vs Bybit sell). You must manage asset custody and transfers between Bitunix and Bybit, or operate a dual-wallet approach with near-instant settlement. Liquidity on Bitunix at $0.016861 and Bybit’s sell-side depth at $0.017225 must be verified; cross-exchange latency could erode profitability.
• Executability verdict: Potentially executable with rapid bridging or pre-funded accounts at both venues; the spread looks solid, but the operational complexity adds risk relative to a pure cross-exchange play.
• Take: Strong spread, moderate execution risk due to custody/transfer latency.

• Buy: Bybit Spot at $0.119300
• Sell: Coinbase at $0.131000
• Available volume: Not specified
• Window duration: Not specified
• Risk factors: Cross-exchange leg (Bybit to Coinbase) demands quick transfer logistics or a mechanism to access both wallets with minimal transfer time. Depth on Bybit at $0.119300 and Coinbase sell-side depth at $0.131000 is critical; price movement on either leg could eliminate the spread.
• Executability verdict: Highly contingent on speed-to-market and cross-exchange funding. If a trader operates a near-zero transfer bridge or has pre-fund on both sides, this is executable. Otherwise, the risk of slippage and transfer delays is non-trivial.
• Take: The spread is compelling, but the cross-exchange transfer risk means you must have a high-performance bridge or pre-funded balances ready to go.

Note: The five opportunities above are chosen as the top five by spread percentage within the provided dataset slice. The full dataset includes 133 total opportunities today, but the rest require similar due-diligence on liquidity, depth, and cross-exchange logistics.

---

📊 Exchange Spread Patterns

• Cross-venue plays: Several opportunities hinge on price discrepancies between Coinbase and non-Coinbase venues (Bybit, Bitunix, Bitget, Gate Futures). The ROSE and APT entries are framed as buy on Coinbase and sell on Coinbase (which effectively tests intra-exchange depth), while TNSR, FIO, and OP rely on cross-exchange legs (Coinbase vs Bybit, Bitunix vs Bybit, Gate vs Bitunix). This pattern suggests a concentration of robust delta opportunities when Coinbase sits opposite other venues, either as the base buy or the counterparty sell.
• Bybit as a perennial counterparty: TNSR and OP illustrate Bybit-based legs (Bybit Spot vs Coinbase) and (Bybit vs Coinbase), showing Bybit’s depth or fee structure can shape practical profitability for cross-venue moves.
• Bitunix and Gate Futures presence: FIO’s Bitunix buy and Bybit sell, and SKYAI’s Gate Futures buy vs Bitunix sell highlight a terrain where newer or derivatives-friendly venues can contribute meaningful spreads, provided you manage custody and liquidity appropriately.
• Intra-exchange vs cross-exchange: The ROSE and APT entries are intra-exchange opportunities on Coinbase (buy at one price, sell at another). These require deep order-book liquidity on Coinbase at both price points to fill both sides and capture the spread, whereas cross-exchange plays demand rapid settlement or pre-funding between venues.
• Pattern takeaway: The most robust and executable spreads tend to be those where the buy and sell legs lie on different venues with quick settlement potential or where one venue’s depth at the buy price complements a strong counterparty depth at the sell price elsewhere. The dataset hints that cross-venue legs (e.g., Coinbase vs Bybit/Bitunix) will offer the most dynamic opportunities when liquidity and transfer speed align.

---

⚡ Speed vs Size Analysis

• Small, fast spreads: The ROSE and APT opportunities are sharp and high-percentage spreads, but intra-exchange legs require rapid execution on a single venue. Speed matters, but depth at the exact quotes is crucial; even a slight slippage can erase the spread.
• Larger, slower spreads: Cross-exchange legs such as TNSR, FIO, and OP offer meaningful raw deltas but hinge on fast pre-funding and low-latency transfer mechanisms. If your bridge or cross-exchange infrastructure is not near-instant, the longer the window to execute, the higher the risk.
• Slippage considerations: For all five, the effective net profit per unit is reduced by slippage on both legs. When volumes scale, even small additional slippage on the buy leg or the sell leg can compound quickly.
• Position sizing recommendations: For high-spread intra-exchange plays with robust depth, you can consider moderate sizes, but monitor book depth at the exact quoted prices. For cross-exchange legs, begin with smaller position sizes until transfer latency is proven under routine conditions, then scale with confidence as you confirm transfer speeds.
• Practical guidance: Use tiered order placement (iceberg-like structures or stepped orders) to minimize market impact. Maintain reserved liquidity on both venues to avoid last-minute liquidity crunches. Have contingency plans for partial fills and quick re-pricing if one leg starts to drift.

---

💰 Profit Calculations

To illustrate, we compute per-unit net profit accounting for typical exchange trading fees (assume a standard 0.2% maker/taker rate on both sides; total trading fee assumed per unit side is 0.2%).

• Net profit per unit formula:

Net per unit = (Sell price - Buy price) - 0.002*(Buy price + Sell price)

• Applied to each top-5 opportunity:

1) ROSE

• Buy price B = 0.011380
• Sell price S = 0.014300
• Gross per unit = S - B = 0.002920
• Net per unit = 0.002920 - 0.002*(0.011380 + 0.014300) = 0.002920 - 0.00005136 = 0.00286864
• Example volumes:
• 1,000 units: net ≈ 2.86864 USD
• 100,000 units: net ≈ 286.864 USD

2) APT

• B = 0.895000
• S = 1.114300
• Gross per unit = 0.219300
• Net per unit = 0.219300 - 0.002*(0.895000 + 1.114300) = 0.219300 - 0.0040186 = 0.2152814
• 1,000 units: ≈ 215.28 USD
• 100,000 units: ≈ 21,528 USD

3) TNSR

• B = 0.043000
• S = 0.047870
• Gross per unit = 0.004870
• Net per unit = 0.004870 - 0.002*(0.043000 + 0.047870) = 0.004870 - 0.00018174 = 0.00468826
• 1,000 units: ≈ 4.69 USD
• 100,000 units: ≈ 468.83 USD

4) FIO

• B = 0.016861
• S = 0.017225
• Gross per unit = 0.000364
• Net per unit = 0.000364 - 0.002*(0.016861 + 0.017225) = 0.000364 - 0.000068172 = 0.000295828
• 1,000 units: ≈ 0.296 USD
• 100,000 units: ≈ 29.58 USD

5) OP

• B = 0.119300
• S = 0.131000
• Gross per unit = 0.011700
• Net per unit = 0.011700 - 0.002*(0.119300 + 0.131000) = 0.011700 - 0.0005006 = 0.0111994
• 1,000 units: ≈ 11.20 USD
• 100,000 units: ≈ 1,119.94 USD

Notes on this calculation:

• The numbers above assume a straightforward two-legged trade with 0.2% trading fees on each side (0.4% total). If your exchange fee schedule uses different maker/taker rates, or if you can secure maker rebates on one side, adjust the net per unit accordingly.
• Withdrawal/transfer fees are not included in the per-unit net in these calculations due to the lack of a fixed, universal withdrawal fee schedule in the provided data. If you know the exact withdrawal fees per asset and per exchange, you should subtract them from the net profits after computing the trading fees.
• The volumes shown are illustrative. Real-world profitability scales with liquidity and the ability to fill both legs without slippage.

Minimum spread worth chasing:

• With the 0.2% per-side fee model, the minimum profitable spread per unit depends on the price level. If you target small lot sizes, spreads in the 0.3–0.5 cent per unit range may barely cover fees, while higher-priced assets with larger delta (like APT) can be highly profitable even at modest volumes. The ROSE case, while offering a large percentage spread, yields only 0.00286864 USD per unit after fees. For large-volume, low-latency setups, this becomes meaningful; for micro-trades, the net per unit might be too small without aggressive execution or rebates.
• Practically, for small-to-mid size trades, aim to targets with net-per-unit above roughly 0.005–0.01 USD after fees if cross-exchange transfers can be completed rapidly; for intra-exchange legs with strong depth, even 0.003–0.005 USD per unit can be attractive if you can reliably fill and avoid slippage.

---

⚠️ Risk Alerts

• Liquidity risk: Many entries assume immediate liquidity at exact prices. If depth is thin, you’ll face slippage that can wipe out the spread.
• Withdrawal/transfer latency: Cross-exchange legs (e.g., Coinbase buy vs Bybit sell, or Bitunix vs Bybit) hinge on fast transfers and bottom-line timing. Delays can turn a guaranteed spread into a loss.
• Exchange reliability: Any sudden issue on Coinbase, Bybit, Bitunix, Bitget, or Gate Futures can halt execution or blow out filled prices.
• Front-running and latency: In fast markets, other traders can peek at your intent and front-run or adjust quotes, reducing your fill probability.
• Custody and account constraints: Pre-funding requirements, KYC checks, and withdrawal cooldowns can impede rapid execution on certain legs.
• Market risk: If spreads tighten, or if one leg retraces before you can exit, your PnL can drop quickly.

---

🔮 Tomorrow’s Setup

• Watch for cross-venue legs that scrape the edges of liquidity between Coinbase and Bybit/Bitunix/Gate Futures. The patterns imply that the strongest potential is where Coinbase sits opposite a fast-responding sub-exchange or derivative venue (Bybit Spot, Gate Futures, etc.).
• Patterns to monitor: Next-day attention to ROSE and APT-type legs with robust Bybit/Bitunix depth, and any new assets showing aggressive price deltas between Coinbase vs non-Coinbase venues.
• Best times to watch: Early market open windows and around major liquidity events (daily settlement windows, major announcements) when spreads can widen but liquidity can recover quickly. If you have automated routing, target the first 30–60 minutes of active US/EU session overlap, when liquidity tends to spike but spreads can widen or collapse quickly.

---

Sign Off

Arbitrage Hunter — March 1, 2026