Arbitrage Hunter — February 13, 2026
🎯 Arb Desk Report
The market is always right, even when it feels chaotic. Today we’ve got 251 total arb events in the books, and a slate of clean, predictable spread plays that smell like opportunity if you’re patient enough to let the liquidity wake up. The best spread on the board sits at 12.43%, with Bitunix buying at $0.055020 and Hyperliquid selling at $0.056143, a spread that speaks to a temporary veneer of mispricings across multiple venues. This is the kind of quiet thunder that shows up when cross-exchange liquidity aligns—not a moonshot, but a steady, repeatable edge for those who respect the friction costs and time windows. As always, the mantra remains: don’t catch falling knives; the market is always right, and patience pays.
For the arb traders tuning their screens, the frame is simple: a set of paired buys and sells that promise a per-unit profit if executed with discipline and proper sizing. The data today underscores a handful of clean, executable patterns across OM, OKX, Hyperliquid, Bybit, Bitget, Gate Futures, Bitunix, and Bitget. The next move for many of us is to watch the baskets that show up consistently and prepare liquidity buffers and withdrawal paths so there’s no scrambling when a window opens or snaps shut.
🏆 Top 5 Arbitrage Opportunities
- Asset: OM spread with Bitunix buy / Hyperliquid sell
- Spread: 12.43%
- Buy on Bitunix at: $0.055020
- Sell on Hyperliquid at: $0.056143
- Available volume: not disclosed
- Window length: not specified in the report data; monitor for short-lived spikes
- Risk factors: liquidity depth on both Bitunix and Hyperliquid; withdrawal speeds; potential price impact if one side tires and runs dry
- Take: This one looks structurally solid on a per-unit basis. The practical execution will hinge on whether either venue can sustain a notional flow long enough to clear risk and fees. Given the gap, it’s a candidate for a measured, staged approach rather than chasing a big notional all at once.
- Asset: OM spread with Hyperliquid buy / Gate Futures sell
- Spread: 12.26%
- Buy on Hyperliquid at: $0.056380
- Sell on Gate Futures at: $0.058200
- Available volume: not disclosed
- Window length: not specified
- Risk factors: cross-exchange liquidity ramps, withdrawal timers, potential API throttling; price correlation during stress
- Take: A solid play on a slightly higher leg than the first one. If you have reliable cross-exchange connectivity and can source liquidity on Hyperliquid without stalling, this is a clean, repeatable edge. Proceed with incremental sizing and monitor the cross-venue fee footprint.
- Asset: OM spread with Hyperliquid buy / Bitget sell
- Spread: 12.26%
- Buy on Hyperliquid at: $0.055480
- Sell on Bitget at: $0.056710
- Available volume: not disclosed
- Window length: not specified
- Risk factors: withdrawal friction on Hyperliquid; Bitget liquidity; potential slippage on the smaller leg
- Take: Similar to the Gate Futures leg, but with Bitget as the counterparty. The edge is present; the key is ensuring both legs can support the same notional without pushing the price into a less favorable execution zone.
- Asset: OM spread with Bitget buy / OKX sell
- Spread: 12.10%
- Buy on Bitget at: $0.059300
- Sell on OKX at: $0.061900
- Available volume: not disclosed
- Window length: not specified
- Risk factors: OKX withdrawal timing; Bitget booking liquidity; potential cross-venue latency
- Take: A slightly smaller spread than the top two, but often OKX’s order books can be deep during sessions with steady traffic. Use a measured ladder approach to keep price impact low, especially if OKX shows robust depth during primetime.
- Asset: OM spread with Bybit buy / OKX sell
- Spread: 11.71%
- Buy on Bybit at: $0.057720
- Sell on OKX at: $0.060440
- Available volume: not disclosed
- Window length: not specified
- Risk factors: cross-exchange latency; OKX’s depth vs Bybit’s entry price; potential funding or transfer delays
- Take: A reliable pairing for traders who favor OKX as the exit leg but have access to Bybit’s liquidity. It’s a classic “buy the dip, sell the slide” setup—still needs a calm, staged execution to avoid slippage.
Extra notes
- The remaining entries (DOGE and POWER lines, plus the remaining OM and Bybit–Hyperliquid legs) are valuable templates for escalations when liquidity wakes up or when you’re running a diversified slate. The DOGE pair on Bybit at 11.23%—buy at 0.096390, sell at 0.107210—can be a higher-variance, higher-consequence play; treat it with smaller footprint unless you’re confident in the Bybit book and fee structure.
- The two POWER plays ( Bitget buy at 0.410340, sell Bitunix at 0.428570) are classic cross-venue, larger-number edges; again, liquidity and withdrawal timing will determine whether they’re executable in size.
📊 Exchange Spread Patterns
- Consistently strong pairs involve Hyperliquid with OKX and Bitget, illustrating how cross-venue liquidity in newer venues can present reliable edges against more established venues like OKX and Gate Futures.
- OKX vs Bitget shows recurring, multi-route spreads, as does Bybit vs OKX in several lines. The pattern suggests a layered market where major venues provide depth but smaller exchanges still offer discrete, exploitable mispricings when cross-referenced.
- Hyperliquid tends to feature prominently in the top spreads against established venues (OKX, Gate Futures, Bitget), which makes it a venue to watch when you’re balancing speed and execution certainty.
- The DOGE line on Bybit stands out as a more volatile edge; use caution here, and consider it as a complementary rather than core anchor in your arb portfolio.
⚡ Speed vs Size Analysis
- The top opportunities favor moderate spreads that reward execution discipline more than sprinting for size. The best edges come from 12%+ gaps that can be captured by incremental, layered entries rather than one big, panic-driven sweep.
- Slippage exposure grows with size, especially on lower-liquidity legs (Hyperliquid, Bitunix, Bitget in some pairs). Aim for tiered execution: smaller initial legs to verify depth, then additional legs if price behavior stays favorable.
- Position sizing: consider a maximum initial exposure per leg that you’re comfortable losing to slippage and withdrawal delays, then scale only if the book remains stable. Patience pays here; don’t chase a single leg that tests the liquidity ceiling.
💰 Profit Calculations
- Gross spread (per unit) example 1: Bitunix buy 0.055020, Hyperliquid sell 0.056143 -> profit per unit = 0.001123
- Gross spread (per unit) example 2: Hyperliquid buy 0.056380, Gate Futures sell 0.058200 -> profit per unit = 0.001820
- Gross spread (per unit) example 3: Hyperliquid buy 0.055480, Bitget sell 0.056710 -> profit per unit = 0.001230
- Gross spread (per unit) example 4: Bitget buy 0.059300, OKX sell 0.061900 -> profit per unit = 0.002600
- Gross spread (per unit) example 5: Bybit buy 0.057720, OKX sell 0.060440 -> profit per unit = 0.002720
- Fees: assume a base trading fee of 0.1% on both sides (typical for many venues, but verify your tier). Example net after fees per unit = gross per unit × (1 - 0.002) approximately, or roughly minus 0.2% round trip.
- Withdrawal fees: vary by venue; for many crypto assets this might be around a few dollars per withdrawal or a small positive on a percent basis, depending on chain congestion and venue policy.
- Net profit per unit example (simplified, ignoring withdrawal fees): Arena 1 net around 0.001123 × (1 - 0.002) ≈ 0.001121 per unit; Arena 4 net around 0.002600 × (1 - 0.002) ≈ 0.002595 per unit.
- Minimum spread worth chasing: generally, you want a net edge after fees that’s above your operational costs and risk; a practical floor is perhaps 0.25%–0.5% net edge per leg for a notional, assuming efficient execution, fast transfers, and good liquidity. The 11%–12% gross levels are attractive provided you can source volume and manage friction. The key is not raw percentage but net realized profit after fees, taxes (where applicable), and withdrawal times.
Net takeaway: With high spreads, think in notional terms you can sustain across both legs, not just per-unit profit. Build a ladder of order sizes and keep a cushion for slippage and latency.
⚠️ Risk Alerts
- Withdrawal delays and cross-venue settlement friction are real threats. In some cases, one leg may move before the other is settled, erasing the spread.
- Liquidity depth on smaller venues can evaporate quickly; always verify available volume before committing. The data here shows 0.0M totals for pump/dump/pressure, which means risk is hidden in the microstructure rather than the macro totals—watch for sudden liquidity droughts.
- Exchange issues, API throttling, or maintenance windows can stall your execution and turn a promising edge into a missed opportunity. Always have a contingency plan to cancel or pull orders if depth collapses.
- Slippage risk on the higher-priced legs (Hyperliquid, Bitget, Bitunix) can erode what looks like a safe spread on paper.
- Don’t rely on a single path; diversify across multiple paired routes to dampen idiosyncratic shocks.
🔮 Tomorrow's Setup
- Monitor Hyperliquid against OKX, Bitget, and Gate Futures as liquidity patterns often reassert themselves after lunch sessions and into early European hours.
- The DOGE cross (Bybit buy 0.096390, sell 0.107210) hints at higher-variance opportunities; keep this one on a tight leash, using small allocations and strict stop rules if you decide to chase it.
- Look for consistent bystander cues: when major venues show depth on both sides of a pair, the cross-venue arbitrage tends to hold over a few hours. Prepare for a few “quiet” days where spreads compress—then be ready to re-enter as liquidity returns.
Sign Off
Patience is the sailor’s compass in this ocean of quotes and prices. Stay disciplined, manage your risk, and let the edges reveal themselves in steady, measured steps. This is how a steady hand grows a quiet fortune in a noisy world.
Arbitrage Hunter — February 13, 2026